vote/2020/platforms/lucas.wml, more fixes http to https

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/english/vote/2013/platforms/lucas.wml b/english/vote/2013/platforms/lucas.wml
index 7cf1baaed2b..d93d2bc2304 100644
--- a/english/vote/2013/platforms/lucas.wml
+++ b/english/vote/2013/platforms/lucas.wml
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 French, 31 years old, Free Software user since 1997, <a
 href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_rank_in_France">Assistant professor
 (<i>Maître de conférences</i>)</a> of Computer Science at <a
-href="http://www.univ-lorraine.fr/">Université de Lorraine</a> where I have the
+href="https://www.univ-lorraine.fr/">Université de Lorraine</a> where I have the
 chance to teach Free Software and Debian in the context of a system
 administration curriculum.
 </p>
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ box</i> on the <a href="https://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dpkg.html">Packages
 Tracking System</a>, and the Ubuntu column in <a
 href="https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=lucas%40debian.org&amp;comaint=yes">DDPO</a>.
 (read more: <a
-href="http://www.loria.fr/~lnussbau/files/fosdem2010-debian-ubuntu.pdf">slides
+href="https://members.loria.fr/LNussbaum/files/fosdem2010-debian-ubuntu.pdf">slides
 from a FOSDEM 2010 talk</a>)
 </dd>
 
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ bad about it, but I try to think of it as detecting problems early, not only as
 delaying releases ;). The same infrastructure is also used to test major
 migrations or toolchain changes involving gcc, <a
 href="http://clang.debian.net/">Clang</a>, and Python. (more info: <a
-href="http://www.loria.fr/~lnussbau/files/fosdem07-auttest.pdf">slides from
+href="https://members.loria.fr/LNussbaum/files/fosdem07-auttest.pdf">slides from
 FOSDEM 2007 talk</a>, <a href="http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/blog/?p=718">blog
 post about the recent move to AWS</a>)
 </dd>
@@ -83,10 +83,10 @@ been developed on top of UDD (including <a
 href="https://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi">bugs.cgi</a> and <a
 href="https://udd.debian.org/dmd.cgi">Debian Maintainer Dashboard</a>) and many
 others rely on UDD as a data source. (more info: <a
-href="http://www.loria.fr/~lnussbau/files/msr2010-udd.pdf">paper</a> + <a
-href="http://www.loria.fr/~lnussbau/files/msr2010-udd-slides.pdf">slides</a> at
+href="https://members.loria.fr/LNussbaum/files/msr2010-udd.pdf">paper</a> + <a
+href="https://members.loria.fr/LNussbaum/files/msr2010-udd-slides.pdf">slides</a> at
 MSR'2010; <a
-href="http://www.loria.fr/~lnussbau/files/debconf9-ultimate-debian-database.pdf">Debconf'09
+href="https://members.loria.fr/LNussbaum/files/debconf9-ultimate-debian-database.pdf">Debconf'09
 talk</a>)</dd>
 
     <dt class="dt-description"><b>Debian packaging tutorial.</b></dt>
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ cases with different <i>products</i> (rolling release, maybe live images),
 without compromising the quality of our stable releases? I even think that
 getting more users of <i>testing</i> would increase the quality of our stable
 releases by having more eyes to find bugs (reminder: <a
-href="http://www.donarmstrong.com/posts/bug_reporting_rate/">the bug reporting
+href="https://www.donarmstrong.com/posts/bug_reporting_rate/">the bug reporting
 rate has been decreasing</a>).
 </p>
 
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ document that process properly, but I'm repeating myself.
 <li class="li-itemize">We should <b>improve our sponsorship infrastructure</b>
 (reminder: <a href="http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/blog/?p=746">half of our
 package maintainers are neither DDs nor DMs</a>): <a
-href="http://mentors.debian.net/">debexpo / mentors.d.n</a> is great, but could
+href="https://mentors.debian.net/">debexpo / mentors.d.n</a> is great, but could
 gain more features, such as more automated QA tests (builds, piuparts). Also, I
 see two ways to work against the shortage of reviewing manpower: (1) finally
 create personal packages archives, so that waiting for reviews becomes slightly