aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/english/vote/2021
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>2021-04-01 21:16:51 +0200
committerKurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>2021-04-01 21:16:51 +0200
commitebca7f98894e9580903892107a9378008ab28d3e (patch)
treea97c12d7a9466b95b7268501e722d4a3b869f08b /english/vote/2021
parenta8314d31649efd799c088a9e0efa0efb1331268c (diff)
Add 6th option
Diffstat (limited to 'english/vote/2021')
-rw-r--r--english/vote/2021/vote_002.wml63
1 files changed, 63 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/english/vote/2021/vote_002.wml b/english/vote/2021/vote_002.wml
index 5adb7e33501..6b57b6a90e6 100644
--- a/english/vote/2021/vote_002.wml
+++ b/english/vote/2021/vote_002.wml
@@ -302,6 +302,7 @@ goal of empowering all users to control technology.</p>
<li>Milan Kupcevic [<email milan@debian.org>] [<a href='https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2021/03/msg00410.html'>mail</a>] </li>
<li>Richard Laager [<email rlaager@debian.org>] [<a href='https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2021/03/msg00418.html'>mail</a>] </li>
<li>Sean Whitton [<email spwhitton@debian.org>] [<a href='https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2021/03/msg00422.html'>mail</a>] </li>
+ <li>Philipp Kern [<email pkern@debian.org>] [<a href='https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2021/04/msg00066.html'>mail</a>] </li>
</ol>
<vtextd />
# <h3>Choice 5</h3>
@@ -345,6 +346,68 @@ of software freedom. But we must never cease in our efforts to ensure that
all contributors are treated with respect, and that they feel safe and
secure in our communities - including when we meet in person.</p>
+ <vproposere />
+ <p>Timo Weingärtner [<email tiwe@debian.org>] [<a href='https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2021/03/msg00195.html'>text of proposal</a>]
+ </p>
+ <vsecondse />
+ <ol>
+ <li>Axel Beckert [<email abe@debian.org>] [<a href='https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2021/03/msg00239.html'>mail</a>] </li>
+ <li>Lionel Élie Mamane [<email lmamane@debian.org>] [<a href='https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2021/03/msg00338.html'>mail</a>] </li>
+ <li>Adam Borowski [<email kilobyte@debian.org>] [<a href='https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2021/03/msg00359.html'>mail</a>] </li>
+ <li>Dmitry Smirnov [<email onlyjob@debian.org>] [<a href='https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2021/04/msg00008.html'>mail</a>] </li>
+ <li>Erik Schanze [<email eriks@debian.org>] [<a href='https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2021/04/msg00009.html'>mail</a>] </li>
+ </ol>
+ <vtexte />
+# <h3>Choice 6</h3>
+<p>The Debian Project co-signs the statement regarding Richard Stallman's
+readmission to the FSF board seen at https://rms-support-letter.github.io/.
+The text of this statement is given below.</p>
+
+<p>Richard M. Stallman, frequently known as RMS, has been a driving force in the
+free software movement for decades, with contributions including the GNU
+operating system and Emacs.</p>
+
+<p>Recently, there have been vile online attacks looking to remove him from the
+FSF board of directors for expressing his personal opinions. We have watched
+this happen before in an organized fashion with other prominent free software
+activists and programmers. We will not stand idly this time, when an icon of
+this community is attacked.</p>
+
+<p>FSF is an autonomous body that is capable of treating its members in a fair,
+unbiased fashion, and should not give in to external social pressures. We urge
+the FSF to consider the arguments against RMS objectively and to truly
+understand the meaning of his words and actions.</p>
+
+<p>Historically, RMS has been expressing his views in ways that upset many
+people. He is usually more focused on the philosophical underpinnings, and
+pursuing the objective truth and linguistic purism, while underemphasising
+people’s feelings on matters he’s commenting on. This makes his arguments
+vulnerable to misunderstanding and misrepresentation, something which we feel
+is happening in the open letter calling for his removal. His words need to be
+interpreted in this context and taking into account that more often than not,
+he is not looking to put things diplomatically.</p>
+
+<p>Regardless, Stallman’s opinions on the matters he is being persecuted over are
+not relevant to his ability to lead a community such as the FSF. Furthermore,
+he is entitled to his opinions just as much as anyone else. Members and
+supporters do not have to agree with his opinions, but should respect his
+right to freedom of thought and speech.</p>
+
+<h4>To the FSF:</h4>
+
+<p>Removing RMS will hurt FSF’s image and will deal a significant blow to the
+momentum of the free software movement. We urge you to consider your actions
+carefully, as what you will decide will have a serious impact on the future of
+the software industry.</p>
+
+<h4>To the ambush mob who is ganging up on Richard Stallman over reasonable
+arguments in debate and various opinions and beliefs voiced over decades as a
+public figure:</h4>
+
+<p>You have no part in choosing the leadership of any communities. Especially not
+via another mob attack which does not remotely resemble a fairly conducted
+debate as exemplified by better people such as Richard Stallman.</p>
+
# <vquorum />
# <p>

© 2014-2024 Faster IT GmbH | imprint | privacy policy