diff options
author | Jens Seidel <jseidel> | 2005-04-19 00:03:33 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jens Seidel <jseidel> | 2005-04-19 00:03:33 +0000 |
commit | d8a2792e101fc9b4143d3d0bf9f1680d8cce47fb (patch) | |
tree | 0cc2da237076da1b69edd232ec75826abc14e0e0 | |
parent | 1a6eec4e9a6ad6acdd6ae3e738c4751f1f030dee (diff) |
removed superfluous space in front of quotation end sign
CVS version numbers
danish/vote/index.wml: 1.6 -> 1.7
english/devel/join/nm-amchecklist.wml: 1.27 -> 1.28
english/vote/index.wml: 1.14 -> 1.15
french/devel/join/nm-amchecklist.wml: 1.10 -> 1.11
italian/devel/join/nm-amchecklist.wml: 1.5 -> 1.6
portuguese/vote/index.wml: 1.5 -> 1.6
-rw-r--r-- | danish/vote/index.wml | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | english/devel/join/nm-amchecklist.wml | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | english/vote/index.wml | 3 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | french/devel/join/nm-amchecklist.wml | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | italian/devel/join/nm-amchecklist.wml | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | portuguese/vote/index.wml | 3 |
6 files changed, 8 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/danish/vote/index.wml b/danish/vote/index.wml index aaebb9c00b8..a71b1b3e6c9 100644 --- a/danish/vote/index.wml +++ b/danish/vote/index.wml @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ #use wml::debian::basic title="Debians afstemningsoplysninger" BARETITLE="true" -#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.14" +#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.15" #use wml::debian::votebar #include "$(ENGLISHDIR)/vote/style.inc" @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ afstemning.</p> <p>Debian anvender <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method">\ Condorcet-metoden</a> i projektledervalgene (den engelsksprogede artikel på Wikipedia, som der linkes til, er ganske informativ). Simplificeret kan -Condorcets metode forklares som følger:<br/> +Condorcets metode forklares som følger:<br /> <q>Tag alle mulige tosidede opgør mellem kandidater i betragtning. Condorcet-vinderen, hvis der er en, er den kandidat som kan slå alle andre kandidater i et tosidet opgør med denne kandidat.</q> diff --git a/english/devel/join/nm-amchecklist.wml b/english/devel/join/nm-amchecklist.wml index 970e8773f8f..7a8344a2913 100644 --- a/english/devel/join/nm-amchecklist.wml +++ b/english/devel/join/nm-amchecklist.wml @@ -126,9 +126,7 @@ There are two steps involved in the AM's final report on an applicant. </UL> <P><A NAME="keynote">[1] Applicants may NOT (repeat: NOT) have a sign only key.</A> You can check for this by looking at their key with - <Q> - "gpg --list-key <applicant's name or key ID>". - </Q> + "gpg --list-key <applicant's name or key ID>". If you see only a "<number>D/" (usually 1024) and no "<number>E/keyID", "<number>e/keyID", nor "<number>g/keyID", then it's a sign only DSA key. diff --git a/english/vote/index.wml b/english/vote/index.wml index e398decb64a..c874862e8d8 100644 --- a/english/vote/index.wml +++ b/english/vote/index.wml @@ -39,8 +39,7 @@ <q>Consider all possible two-way races between candidates. The Condorcet winner, if there is one, is the one candidate who can beat each other candidate in a two-way - race with that candidate. - </q> + race with that candidate.</q> The problem is that in complex elections, there may well be a circular relations ship in which A beats B, B beats C, and C beats A. Most of the variations on Condorcet use diff --git a/french/devel/join/nm-amchecklist.wml b/french/devel/join/nm-amchecklist.wml index 9e99c18ce89..8a79a4b8343 100644 --- a/french/devel/join/nm-amchecklist.wml +++ b/french/devel/join/nm-amchecklist.wml @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ #use wml::debian::template title="Liste de contrôle pour les responsables de candidature" -#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.27" maintainer="Nicolas Bertolissio" +#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.28" maintainer="Nicolas Bertolissio" <ul> <li><a href="#identification">vérification de l'identité</a> ;</li> diff --git a/italian/devel/join/nm-amchecklist.wml b/italian/devel/join/nm-amchecklist.wml index 3bb9c29f7ee..92213a048e3 100644 --- a/italian/devel/join/nm-amchecklist.wml +++ b/italian/devel/join/nm-amchecklist.wml @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ #use wml::debian::template title="Checklist per i Manager di Candidatura" -#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.27" maintainer="Giuseppe Sacco" +#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.28" maintainer="Giuseppe Sacco" <UL> <LI><A HREF="#identification">Controllo di identità</A></LI> @@ -138,9 +138,7 @@ Sono due i passi richiesti nel rapporto finale del AM per un candidato. <P><A NAME="keynote">[1] I candidati NON possono (ripeto: NON) avere una chiave solo firmata.</A> Puoi verificare questa cosa leggendo la loro chiave con - <Q> - "gpg --list-key <nome del candidato o key ID>". - </Q> + "gpg --list-key <nome del candidato o key ID>". Se vedi solo un "<number>D/" (generalmente 1024) e nessun "<number>E/keyID", "<number>e/keyID", né "<number>g/keyID", allora si tratta di una chiave DSA diff --git a/portuguese/vote/index.wml b/portuguese/vote/index.wml index 896ea29ed13..1ace8435f15 100644 --- a/portuguese/vote/index.wml +++ b/portuguese/vote/index.wml @@ -42,8 +42,7 @@ <q>Considere todas as disputas possíveis entre os candidatos. O vencedor Condorcet, se houver um, é o candidato que bater cada um dos outros em uma disputa de ida-e-volta - com aquele candidato. - </q> + com aquele candidato.</q> O problema é que em eleições complexas, podem acontecer relações circulares nas quais A bate B, B bate C e C bate A. A maioria das variações do Condorcet usam vários modos para resolver |