From ff77abe70f98fe7973da13b522bc40a1bf5f4b9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Salvatore Bonaccorso Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 13:47:31 +0200 Subject: LTS templates: Replace use of Jessie with Stretch Signed-off-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso --- templates/lts-no-dsa.txt | 8 ++++---- templates/lts-update-planned-minor.txt | 6 +++--- templates/lts-update-planned.txt | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) (limited to 'templates') diff --git a/templates/lts-no-dsa.txt b/templates/lts-no-dsa.txt index 923d6fff4d..dfc2bc5881 100644 --- a/templates/lts-no-dsa.txt +++ b/templates/lts-no-dsa.txt @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 To: {{ to }} Cc: {{ cc }} -Subject: About the security issues affecting {{ package }} in Jessie +Subject: About the security issues affecting {{ package }} in Stretch Dear maintainer(s), The Debian LTS team recently reviewed the security issue(s) affecting your -package in Jessie: +package in Stretch: {%- if cve -%} {% for entry in cve %} https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/{{ entry }} @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/{{ entry }} https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/{{ package }} {%- endif %} -We decided that we would not prepare a jessie security update (usually +We decided that we would not prepare a stretch security update (usually because the security impact is low and that we concentrate our limited resources on higher severity issues and on the most widely used packages). -That said the jessie users would most certainly benefit from a fixed +That said the stretch users would most certainly benefit from a fixed package. If you want to work on such an update, you're welcome to do so. Please diff --git a/templates/lts-update-planned-minor.txt b/templates/lts-update-planned-minor.txt index b564e6634f..61b704418f 100644 --- a/templates/lts-update-planned-minor.txt +++ b/templates/lts-update-planned-minor.txt @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 To: {{ to }} Cc: {{ cc }} -Subject: Jessie update of {{ package }} (minor security issues)? +Subject: Stretch update of {{ package }} (minor security issues)? The Debian LTS team recently reviewed the security issue(s) affecting your -package in Jessie: +package in Stretch: {%- if cve -%} {% for entry in cve %} https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/{{ entry }} @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ We decided that a member of the LTS team should take a look at this package, although the security impact of still open issues is low. When resources are available on our side, one of the LTS team members will start working on fixes for those minor security issues, as we think that -the jessie users would most certainly benefit from a fixed package. +the stretch users would most certainly benefit from a fixed package. If you'd rather want to work on such an update yourself, you're welcome to do so. Please send us a short notification to the debian-lts mailing diff --git a/templates/lts-update-planned.txt b/templates/lts-update-planned.txt index c8257af4b8..21f820755b 100644 --- a/templates/lts-update-planned.txt +++ b/templates/lts-update-planned.txt @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 To: {{ to }} Cc: {{ cc }} -Subject: Jessie update of {{ package }}? +Subject: Stretch update of {{ package }}? Dear maintainer(s), The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are -currently open in the Jessie version of {{ package }}: +currently open in the Stretch version of {{ package }}: {%- if cve -%} {% for entry in cve %} https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/{{ entry }} -- cgit v1.2.3